Home Database Case studies Flood defence framework for National Grid substations in United Kingdom
Website experience degraded
The European Climate and Health Observatory is undergoing reconstruction until June 2024 to improve its performance. We apologise for any possible disturbance to the content and functionality of the platform.
Case studies

Flood defence framework for National Grid substations in United Kingdom

Flood defence framework for National Grid substations in United Kingdom

The United Kingdom has historically experienced severe flood events, including that of summer 2007, which resulted in the loss of essential services including water and energy supply, as well as the destruction of infrastructures, with estimated costs exceeding £3.2 billion. About half a million people were immediately affected by this event, in terms of temporary absence of energy supply. In any of such flood event, once energy supply is impacted, so are other services as water distribution, transport, communication and health care.

The ‘Pitt Review: Lessons learned from the 2007 floods’ was published in June 2008; in anticipation of its findings, the UK Energy Minister requested a comprehensive assessment of the resilience to flooding of primary and higher voltage substations and the steps that may be taken to mitigate current and future risks. The Energy Networks Association (ENA) Substation Resilience to Flooding Task Group was established, reporting to the Energy Emergencies Executive Committee (E3C), and was asked to lead this work. This work included representation from National Grid Electricity Transmission, which owns and maintains the high voltage electricity transmission network in England and Wales, as well as all UK energy transmission and distribution companies, and led to the production and publication of ENA Engineering Technical Report (ETR) 138. Its first version was published in October 2009, and a second version of ETR 138 was released in January 2016. The National Flood Resilience Review (NFRR) carried out in 2016 prompted a further update to ETR 138, which recognises that the electricity industry is seen as leading the way with proactive flood risk management and the 1:1000-year target resilience level being applied for all critical local infrastructure supplying 10,000 customers or more.

The Pitt Review recommended a target of 1:200 year resilience level. However, it was felt by the ENA task group this did not go far enough to mitigate the flooding risks the energy sector faced by 2050 (considering climate change effects expected under a high emission scenario (UKCP09, corresponding to the IPCC SRES A1FI scenario)) which led to the assessment of the vulnerability of all substations to a 1:1,000 year flooding event. Consequently, flood measures to protect the most vulnerable substations were identified, including: flood barriers; portable flood defence measures; earth bunds; flood doors and gates; drainage systems and pumping stations; flood storage reservoirs; and land management-based measures. By 2021, all vulnerable high risk National Grid substations will be protected against the targeted flooding events with a continued investment in flood resilience for surface water risks planned for the next regulatory period.

Case Study Description

Challenges

In the United Kingdom, a number of electricity substations are located in floodplains. Substations play a central role in the energy supply network. When flooding occurs, these may fall out, resulting in cascading effects on other sectors like water supply, health care, transportation, communication and emergency services. Strong winds often come hand in hand with flooding, and can further impact on the distribution network, e.g. removing poles and wires.

Fall-out of power supply can have far-reaching impacts on people’s lives as well as having broader economic impacts, which largely increase the indirect impacts of floods. The summer 2007 flood temporary resulted in about half a million people without access to energy supply. Total costs from this event were estimated to exceed £ 3.2 billion. An estimate of the economic cost of winter floods (2015 to 2016) on the energy sector (mainly distribution) is £ 83m (low £75m - high £ 91m at 2015 prices).

Climate change is expected to exacerbate flood risk, increasing the intensity and frequency of flooding events.

Objectives

The National Grid Substation Flood Defence Framework is a nationwide programme aimed at improving resilience of the electricity transmission power network to any type of floods (fluvial, tidal, pluvial and groundwater flooding as well as potential flooding from sewers and drains and flooding from reservoir failure). The specific objective of the adaptation measures implemented through this programme is the protection of National Grid’s substations from flooding by preventing water entering these infrastructures, thus decreasing the risk to the security of supply and ensuring the transmission network maintains electricity supply.

Measures have been identified and designed to ensure protection from a 1:1,000 year flood event, considering climate change effects expected under a high emission scenario (UKCP09, corresponding to the IPCC SRES A1FI scenario) by 2080. In cases where this target is not achievable, National Grid will reduce this protection to protect for a 1:200 year flood event, while still considering the effects of climate change at 2050 per a high emission scenario or a 1:1000 flood event at today’s levels.

Solutions

The approach applied to improve the resilience of the grid substations to flood consisted of two steps. The first step focused on the assessment of vulnerability and flooding risk. Substations impacted by a 1:100 year, 1:200 year, 1:1,000 year and 1:1,000 year+ climate change flood event were identified, taking into account the expected effects of climate change as per the high UKCP09 emission scenario. The second step deals with the identification, design and implementation of flood defence solutions for each of the critical substations. This step has been implemented through two stages. In the first stage, 11 high risk substations were identified and protected; these are substations that could experience impact during a 1:100 year flood event. The second stage focuses on the protection of further 38 medium risk substations; these are substations that could experience impact in case of a 1:200 year or 1:1,000 year flood event. The programme started in 2008 and by 2021, all of National Grid’s 49 critical (high and medium risk) substations will be flood-proofed. A further estimated 100 surface water risk sites will be protected by 2026.

Applied flood resilience solutions consist of combinations of following practices: flood barriers; portable flood defence measures; earth bunds; flood doors and gates; drainage systems and pumping stations; flood storage reservoirs; land management-based measures; and coordinated local solutions with the Environment Agency.

For larger sites with multiple at risk points, whole site protection combining the above measures is often the preferred and efficient approach in order to ensure that the entire operational area remains protected against flooding hazards. This typically involves the construction of a hard flood wall around the perimeter of the site. This was, for example, applied at Walham substation, located just outside of Gloucester in South West England, where steel piles were tucked into the ground around the 1 km perimeter of the site to form a base for the defence wall. Next, a cast concrete flood wall between 1.6 and 1.9 m high was built to protect the site from a 1:1,000 year flooding event. Five pumping stations were also installed to deal with potential seepage or any residual ingress of flood water. Another example is the Stella South substation, located near the River Tyne in Newburn, and with an operation of 132 kV. This substation has been protected through a hard flood barrier and a soft defence earth bund built with local materials in order to reduce the ecological impact of the construction. Aberthaw substation West of Cardiff in South Wales represents a third example; this 132 kV substation is now protected by a 2.4 m high piled concrete flood wall.

However, whole site protection is not always the best approach as it may reduce floodplain area for water storage and may redirect flood waters to grounds of neighbouring houses. Provided that critical equipment remains unaffected by floodwaters, the site can remain operational even if the part of the site is subject to flooding.

Recognising that flooding risks would not be mitigated immediately, National Grid purchased an initial 1.7 km of demountable barrier system and expanded this to 2.3 km following the flooding events during 2014 to 2015. This 2.3 km mobile defence equipment brings capability to protect multiple sites at the same time: one very large site; or two large sites; or three normal size sites. Currently there are seven trailers arranged as three pairs (with the seventh trailer carrying extra corners and equipment) which can operate independently with its own forklift and diesel supply for pumps. The barrier is also available for gas sites and, given enough mobilisation and installation time, could be used on any site. 12 x 3,000 litres pumps which can pump 3 tons per min are part of the barrier equipment and supplemented by a further 10 smaller pumps for use in smaller areas such as buildings etc. Typically, from arriving on an average site, it would take 8 to 12 hours to deploy the barrier depending on the complexity of the site. Barrier exercises are regularly carried out.

National Grid maintains round-the-clock vigilance monitoring weather-related risks through its control room. Its sites are registered with the Environment Agency’s flood alert system and receive the daily Flood Forecasting Centre and Natural Hazards Partnership alerts. National Grid is a participating member of the Flood Forecasting Centre and the Natural Hazards Partnership working groups, and data from the MET office and other weather forecasts are monitored for potential risks.

Relevance

Case developed and implemented as a Climate Change Adaptation Measure.

Additional Details

Stakeholder Participation

The National Grid Flood Defence Framework is applied to electricity transmission only and developed to implement ETR 138. The risk assessments were carried out by a number of professional consultancies. During the phases of vulnerability assessment and design of flood measures, National Grid closely collaborated with the UK Environment Agency, Natural Resources of Wales, local authorities, Internal Drainage Boards and its energy partners within the ETR 138 framework. Furthermore, in the development of the framework based on ETR 138, National Grid has sought approval for the defence plans from the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) and our regulator, Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem).

Success and Limiting Factors

Success factors for the implementation of the adaptation measures part of the National Grid Substation Flood Defence Framework include a clear vision, clear target resilience levels, strong leadership and a good collaboration and partnership with local and national authorities. As BEIS and Ofgem are signatories and are involved in producing and updating ETR 138, this has streamlined the process for funding and justifying the investments in flood resilience.

Locally relevant limiting factors can include other sectors not working to as high a resilience level. As flooding data, modelling and experience from actual flooding events constantly matures and is refined this creates a challenging situation to maintain a target 1:1,000 resilience level. There are several example sites where flood levels have either increased or decreased which has then influenced the flood resilience solution.

Costs and Benefits

The total cost for the implementation of the first phase of National Grid Substation Flood Defence Framework is circa £117 million, with an expected additional £59m for further resilience investment for surface water risks. Spend on demountable defences is estimated at between £ 2.5 – £3m and includes deployment for both exercises and real events.

Expected benefits are the protection from flooding of National Grid substations and the maintenance of energy supply, thus preventing cascade effects on other sectors and services.

The main legal drivers for the adaptation measures part of the National Grid Substation Flood Defence Framework are the Flood Risk Regulation (2009), which is part of the implementation process of the EU Floods Directive, and the UK Climate Change Act (2008), including the periodic reporting requirements by sectors.

The Flood Risk Regulation 2009 requires Lead Local Flood Authorities (LLFAs), the Environment Agency and Natural Resources Wales, to prepare and publish Flood Risk Management Plans (FRMPs) on a six-year cycle. The UK Climate Change Act requests that National Grid reports on a regular basis on adaptation response activities. This assessment and reporting have also encouraged National Grid to proceed with flood defence activities.

Implementation Time

The National Grid Substation Flood Defence Framework started in 2008. Implementation of flood protection from tidal and fluvial risk is expected to be completed by 2021. However, where efficiencies have been identified in coordinating works with major site development and Environment Agencies schemes a small number of sites will go beyond this date. Further investment in surface water risks will be made within regulatory reporting period 2021 to 2026.

Life Time

The National Grid Substation Flood Defence Framework includes a wide variety of specific measures, each of which has a specific lifetime. Generally, lifetime ranges between 30 to 80 years. National Grid views flooding risks as a long-term adaptation issue and will require frequent review and vigilance.

Reference Information

Contact

Douglas Dodds
Environmental Engineer
National Grid Electricity Transmission
E-mail: douglas.dodds@nationalgrid.com 
Tel.: +44 (0)7825 385425

Reference
National Grid, Mott MacDonald and Energy Networks Association

Published in Climate-ADAPT Jul 12 2019   -   Last Modified in Climate-ADAPT Apr 18 2024


Please contact us for any other enquiry on this Case Study or to share a new Case Study (email climate.adapt@eea.europa.eu)

Document Actions