All official European Union website addresses are in the europa.eu domain.
See all EU institutions and bodiesDescription
Access to an adequate supply of water is central to a sustainable future, especially considering climate change is expected to exacerbate water scarcity problems in several European regions. The reuse of water is considered as an adaptation measure. It reduces the pressure on water resources while preserving water security for human activities and for the functioning of ecosystems.
Water reuse means to reclaim wastewater from a variety of sources and treated to a standard appropriate for a second purpose. Any type of wastewater (domestic, municipal, or industrial) can be considered for reuse and, depending on its quality, can be deployed for several secondary purposes in various sectors. Secondary purposes include for example agricultural irrigation, groundwater recharge, industrial processes, drinking (potable) water supply and non-drinking urban applications (irrigation of parks, toilet flushing, etc.). Water reuse is increasingly applied for agricultural irrigation as it is a reliable source also during times of limited water availability. The use of nutrient-rich treated wastewater for agriculture may, in addition, lead to a reduction (or elimination) of fertilizer application or increased productivity and can also contribute to food security, if requirements of specific water use regulations are met. Using treated wastewater can also help conserve groundwater if this is used for irrigation. A straightforward application is the use of treated wastewater for cooling purposes in industrial processes (business and industry sector), as lower requirements regarding water quality are needed. Potable water reuse refers to the use of properly treated wastewater for drinking purposes; it is a valuable option for water supply in areas where water is particularly limited. Another potential application of reused water can be in the tourism sector, in order to support the mitigation of tourism pressure on water resources. Tourism relies directly or indirectly on considerable water resources for accommodations, infrastructures, and activities. Water reuse can for example be considered in hotels for swimming pools, flushing toilets, irrigation of gardens or golf fields, and snowmaking for skiing. Water reuse is particularly relevant for tourism destinations that are particularly prone to drought risk (e.g. Mediterranean countries) or that do not have large and accessible water resources, for example in islands (e.g. in islands, Circular Water Solutions in Southern Gotland,).
Two types of potable water reuse exist: direct and indirect. Direct potable reuse is treated wastewater that is piped into a water supply system without being diluted in a natural stream, lake or groundwater before. Indirect reuse involves mixing of reclaimed wastewater with another water supply before treatment and re-use. In both cases, compliance with existing drinking water regulations is necessary.
Water reuse can serve as a dependable water source in some specific situations, contributing to a more sustainable resource utilisation and sound supply management, in particular under water scarcity conditions. This measure can reduce both overall water consumption and treatment needs, resulting in cost savings. Water reuse can also contribute to the conservation of freshwater systems and can enhance the restoration of streams, wetlands and ponds.
Additional Details
Adaptation Details
IPCC categories
Structural and physical: Service options, Structural and physical: Technological optionsStakeholder participation
Water reuse initiatives can be implemented at a variety of spatial scales and involve different actors. The measure is difficult to implement in countries without an adequate institutional and normative background to facilitate re-use, or where socio-cultural acceptance and conflicts may hamper the implementation of this option. Stakeholder involvement is a key component of their implementation, because this adaptation option may raise several issues of concern for the general public especially regarding the quality of reused water. Consistent communication and easily understood messages explaining the benefits of water reuse need to be delivered to the public and stakeholders. The potential risks associated with the use of wastewater should be examined and addressed in order to obtain support from the involved stakeholders. Demonstration projects and sharing successful cases can be part of participatory activities.
Success and limiting factors
The JRC report "Water Reuse in Europe" (2014) lists the following main barriers for the implementation of water reuse schemes:
- Inconsistent and unreliable methods for identifying and optimising appropriate wastewater treatment technologies for reuse applications, which are able to balance the competing demands of sustainable processes
- Difficulties in specifying and selecting effective monitoring techniques, to ensure that water quality is compliant with the use requirements
- Significant challenges in reliably assessing the environmental and public health risks/benefits of water reuse across a range of geographical scales
- Poorly developed business models for water reuse schemes, and markets for reclaimed water
- Low levels of public and government enthusiasm for water reuse
- Limited institutional capacity to formulate and institutionalise recycling and reuse measures
- Lack of financial incentives for reuse schemes.
One of the key success factors is stakeholder support and involvement to avoid strong opposition to planned schemes. Interested stakeholders should receive sufficient knowledge to understand the safety and applicability of reused water.
Costs and benefits
The possible benefits of the reuse of treated water for economy, society and the environment are numerous.. These include reducing household water demand and easing pressure on public water supply, reducing upstream energy and environmental costs. The costs of recycling water may exceed those of using fresh water directly, but are justified by the several benefits water recycling provides: it saves high quality water for drinking, it reduces the amount of polluted water released to the environment, and it may have a quality making it suitable for specific alternative uses (e.g. relative high nutrient contents may provide fertilizers through its use for irrigation). However, beyond water reuse, it is also important to implement strategies that aim to decrease the overall water demand which is one of the major causes of water scarcity. Alternative water reuse treatment technologies and other water saving solutions (see for example the adaptation options Reducing water consumption for cooling of thermal generation plants, and water restrictions and water rationing) should also be assessed. Holistic life cycle assessments can be applied in those assessments considering costs and benefits for saving water resources and reducing carbon emissions..
Prices for reused water prices should consider all those additional benefits. Public subsidies might be used to support the compensation of higher water tariffs. In general, the allocation of costs is a political decision, which defines how they will be divided between the general taxation and fees for those interested by the benefits of water reuse.
Legal aspects
In the 2007 “Communication on Water scarcity and Droughts”, water reuse is considered as a potential solution to alleviate the impacts of climate change across Europe. The Communication "Blueprint to safeguard Europe's water resources" emphasized this further in 2012 where the maximisation of water reuse was set as a specific objective. In 2016, an EU guidance document on “Integrating Water Reuse into Water Planning and Management in the context of the WFD” for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive was published.
In 2020, the European Commission released a “Regulation on minimum requirements for water reuse for agricultural irrigation”. The new rules apply from 26 June 2023 and are expected to stimulate and facilitate water reuse in the EU. The Regulation sets out harmonised minimum water quality requirements for the safe reuse of treated urban wastewater in agricultural irrigation, harmonised minimum monitoring requirements, risk management provisions to assess and address potential additional health risks, and possible environmental risks, permitting requirements and provisions on transparency, whereby key information about any water reuse project is made available to the public.
Implementation time
The implementation time strongly depends on the specific scope and measure adopted for water reuse. The full implementation of water reuse schemes might be in the range of 5-15 years. Some initiatives may take a longer time if the acceptance level of local communities is low.
Lifetime
The lifetime of water reuse schemes strictly depends on social acceptance, proper maintenance of applied solutions and evidence of real occurring benefits. Usually, the lifetime is greater than 25 years.
Reference information
Websites:
References:
Alcalde Sanz L, and Gawlik B., (2014). Water Reuse in Europe - Relevant guidelines, needs for and barriers to innovation. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
Angelakis, A. N., Gikas, P., (2014). Water reuse: overview of current practices and trends in the world with emphasis on EU states. Water Utility Journal, 8, 67-78
Kirhensteine, I., Cherrier, V., Jarritt, N., Farmer, A., De Paoli, G., Delacamara, G., and Psomas, A. (2016). EU-level instruments on water reuse. Final Report to Support the Commission’s Impact. Assessment, 1-292.
Pistocchi, A., Aloe, A., Dorati, C., Alcalde Sanz, L., Bouraoui, F., Gawlik, B., Grizzetti, B., Pastori, M. and Vigiak, O., (2017). The potential of water reuse for agricultural irrigation in the EU: A Hydro-Economic Analysis. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
lcalde Sanz, L. and Gawlik, B., (2017). Minimum quality requirements for water reuse in agricultural irrigation and aquifer recharge - Towards a water reuse regulatory instrument at EU level. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
Santana, M. V., Cornejo, P. K., Rodríguez-Roda, I., Buttiglieri, G., & Corominas, L. (2019). Holistic life cycle assessment of water reuse in a tourist-based community. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.290
Gössling, S., Peeters, P., Hall, C. M., Ceron, J., Dubois, G., Lehmann, L. V., & Scott, D. (2012). Tourism and water use: Supply, demand, and security. An international review. Tourism Management, 33(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.03.015
Published in Climate-ADAPT: Feb 10, 2021
Case studies related to this option:
Language preference detected
Do you want to see the page translated into ?