All official European Union website addresses are in the europa.eu domain.
See all EU institutions and bodiesDescription
Several approaches can be used to climate-proof of buildings against excessively high temperatures. Such options relate to building design (including the use of IT technologies to optimise thermal comfort) and building envelopes (roof, ceilings, external walls, doors, windows – including solar control glasses that reduce the solar radiation entering the dwelling - and foundations).
Building design solutions include traditional features commonly found in regions with warm climates, such as:
- Building aspect ratio: The ratio between interior space and the external surface of the building, which optimizes internal heat dispersion while minimizing solar heat absorption.
- Architectonical elements: Features like awnings, overhangs, window shades, porticoes, white or lightly coloured external walls and roofs to reflect heat.
- Solar orientation: Positioning the building to minimise the daily exposure to direct sunlight.
Hi-tech solutions can also play a very important role. These include sensors that monitor thermal conditions, enabling precise adjustments of air conditioning and ventilation, as well as the real time orientation of shading panels based on insulation conditions. Sensors and digital thermal regulation devices can be integrated with demand side management measures, helping to reduce the impact of cooling demand on peak loads during periods of electrical system stress (see also the adaptation option on changes in individual behaviour in the energy sector). A famous example of a building in which a complete package of state-of-the-art solutions has been applied is The Edge office building in Amsterdam, completed in 2014. Its envelope includes dynamic windows, automatic shades and displacement ventilation. With 28,000 sensors monitoring movement, lighting levels, humidity and temperature, the building can immediately adjust to energy needs, such as automatically switching off heating, air conditioning and lighting in unused areas. Moreover, employees can use an app to adjust temperature and lighting levels in their work space. Additionally, cooling and heating is optimized by heat transfers between the building and an aquifer beneath it.
The technical features of the building envelope are crucial for its ability to control indoor temperatures. The materials used in the envelope and their mass play a key role in how quickly temperature differences between indoors and outdoors are compensated. For example, traditional thick-walled buildings in the Mediterranean require far less air conditioning than modern structures. Alternatively, using materials with high thermal resistance can help minimize the heat entering the building. This option is particularly interesting for retrofitting existing building with insulation layers that compensate the poor thermal properties of the original building materials.
Also, the use of mechanical or natural ventilation, or storing cold in materials with high thermal mass like tiles or stones, reduces the need of air-conditioning. Cold storage can be coupled with a heat pump (possibly based on a geothermal system, exploiting the differential between underground and surface temperatures) to increase the flexibility in the deployment of cold air. Adjusting indoor humidity can have a strong impact on perceived temperatures and ultimately on thermal comfort of the occupants of a building.
Roofsare also important heat exchange surfaces, and their design (e.g. white roofs, green roofs) can help reducing significantly the energy needs of a building. For instance, the presence of trees increases air flow, reduces the impact of solar radiation and also helps counteract the urban heat island effect. When implementing measures to cope with extreme heat, it is in fact important to consider the impact of building materials and building styles on the microclimate of urban areas. Urban heat mitigation research promotes the use of reflective surfaces to counteract the negative effects of extreme heat. Surface reflectance is a key parameter for understanding, modeling and modifying the urban surface energy balance, to cool cities, and improve outdoor thermal comfort (Fox et al., 2018). Solutions for reducing the urban heat island effect, while improving indoor conditions through the building envelope, can be approached in two ways: increasing solar reflection and enhancing evaporation and transpiration. Solar reflectance (albedo) of building exteriors and urban paving can help mitigate the heat island effect. This can be achieved by using cold colour coatings and reflective coatings such as retro-reflective materials. Additionally, increasing evaporation and transpiration can be facilitated by green surfaces and trees, like vertical greeneries, green facades and green roofs.
Additional information about the use of green infrastructure to improve the liveability of cities under climate change can be found in the Climate-ADAPT adaptation option urban green and blue infrastructure.
Specific attention should given to historical buildings, as many of the measures described may not be applicable due to existing laws and regulations aimed at preserving the original materials and construction techniques used. Different specific interventions need to be identified, planned and implemented, carefully taking into consideration the characteristics of historical buildings and their cultural meaning. It is highly recommended to consult with experts in historical preservation and building engineering to develop a tailored cooling plan for specific buildings. However, climate proofing solutions that preserve the historical significance of buildings while maintaining their architectural and cultural value are already available. Some examples are provided by the RIBuild project.
The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) allows Member States to adapt minimum energy performance requirements for both residential (art 5.2), and non-residential buildings (art. 9.6a).
Additional Details
Adaptation Details
IPCC categories
Structural and physical: Ecosystem-based adaptation options, Structural and physical: Technological optionsStakeholder participation
The characteristics of a building, including the way it prevents excessive indoor heating, are usually a private contractual matter between the builder and the buyers of the building. Stakeholder participation can be relevant in case of large public buildings, in case the costs of the proposed design is significantly higher than those of a standard building and this can generate worries about the impact on public budgets, and/or about the ability of the proponent to find adequate funding for the project. Among the options mentioned, creating green areas around buildings for shading is subject to the standard authorization process. It also requires consultation with local communities to gauge their preference for this solution over alternative uses of the space. The involvement of cultural heritage organisations and authorities is needed for renovating historical buildings, especially when specific permitting procedures need to be followed.
Success and limiting factors
The main obstacles to climate-proof building design are economic and cultural. Some of the option proposed (higher quality material for building envelopes, green roofs, automated window shading) are more expensive and more difficult to implement and maintain than standard building practices. Culturally, architects may perceive their creativity reduced by the complexity of some of these solutions. Designing a building with total freedom of choice as to shapes and materials, while relying on air-conditioning to take care of indoor thermal comfort is a tempting perspective that reduces technical challenges, building costs and increases the aesthetic range for design options. This is particularly relevant for large building units such as skyscrapers, malls, campuses etc. The relevance of this obstacle is likely to fall in the coming years as climate-proofing solutions reach technological maturity and technological innovation will drive down their costs. However, there is no guarantee that the flexibility in building design currently offered by air-conditioning will ever be equalled by these solutions.
On the other hand, particularly for smaller units such as single-family homes or small-medium sized residential neighbourhoods, climate-proofing can prove a very stimulating design challenge. There are a number of initiatives in the EU implementing green solutions for residential buildings and urban planning, including greening of urban landscapes, awareness raising campaigns and financial incentives. Among others, examples of financial incentives can be found in Rotterdam (Climate Adaptation Subsidy), in Hamburg (Hamburg’s Green Roof Strategy, ) and Italy (green bonus).
Moreover, climate proofing in existing buildings, especially cultural heritage ones, pose specific challenges, because of regulations and conservation paradigms. The challenge is to find a balance between adapting to climate change and safeguarding the authenticity and integrity of these historical sites.
Costs and benefits
Costs vary according to the solution applied and the location where they are implemented due to the different maturity of the industry and local building characteristics. According to the Hamburg’s Green Roof Strategy case study, green roofs are an investment with clear future returns. Costs for most extensive green roofs are in the range of 40-45 € /m2, while intensive green roofs can cost about 58 € /m2.
White roofs are significantly less expensive. Wall and roof insulation prices vary widely according the insulating material, but usually range between EUR 40 and 100 per square meter. Solar control glasses’ prices are comparable or marginally higher than standard insulating glasses commonly installed in European homes’ windows. Packing a full menu of state-of-the-art climate-proofing solutions into a building can be costly, and it is easier to do it from scratch by designing a new building to that purpose. The extremely energy efficient and thermally comfortable 39,673 m2 of office space (plus 11,558 m2 of indoor parking space) of The Edge building required an investment of 74 million EUR (total building costs).
These costs must be weighed against the beneficial impacts on households, firms and public administrations budgets in terms of energy savings, which for state-of-the-art solutions can be very substantial and even result in near-zero net energy use. The increase of green spaces in an urban context brings about also a number of co-benefits in terms of improved health, urban biodiversity, social interactions, and aesthetic improvements.
Legal aspects
At the regulatory level, the technical solutions mentioned above can be incorporated into building codes. When this is not already enforced, a regulatory move in this direction is advisable for EU countries with a warm climate.
The revised Energy Performance in Buildings Directive (EU/2024/1275), enhances the energy performance requirements for new buildings. It requires all new residential and non-residential buildings to be zero-emission buildings as of 1 January 2028 for buildings owned by public bodies and 1 January 2030 for all other new buildings, with the possibility for specific exemptions. According to the revised directive, a zero-emission building has no on-site carbon emissions from fossil fuels and a very high energy performance . Although not directly targeting adaptation to high temperatures, these requirements will call for a widespread application of the measures here described.
Implementation time
The implementation time varies according to the type of intervention, ranging from a few hours to install curtains and shades to several months or even years to design and build a climate-proof building from scratch.
Lifetime
Lifetime varies with the type of intervention, ranging from few years to the residual lifetime of the building.
Reference information
Websites:
References:
International Energy Agency (2018). The Future of Cooling. Opportunities for energy-efficient air conditioning.
Adaptive measures for preserving heritage buildings in the face of climate change: A review
Published in Climate-ADAPT: Mar 23, 2020
Case studies related to this option:
Language preference detected
Do you want to see the page translated into ?