Description

Biodiversity provides a wide range of ecosystem services (provisioning, regulation and maintenance, cultural services) which are essential for the human well-being. Among the others, these services play an important role in regulating the climate, thus making a key contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation. However, human activities are responsible for growing pressures and impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems, and climate change is expected to massively intensify these threats leading to:

  • Changes in species abundance and distribution, also as a consequence of modification and loss (e.g. due to sea level rise) of habitats;
  • Changes in phenology which may lead to loss of synchrony between species;
  • Changes in community composition (changes in the types and abundance of species in an ecosystem due to their varying ability to adapt to shifting conditions caused by climate change);
  • Changes in ecosystem processes, functions and services;

Conserving biodiversity and maintaining the nature’s capacity to deliver goods and services is global priority. Given the interconnectedness of biodiversity, ecosystems, and climate change, addressing their impacts in holistic way is crucial for effective conservation. A crucial aspect is adopting an ecosystem-based approach to climate change adaptation and mainstreaming  nature-based solutions in development and conservation policies.

Resilient ecosystems and their related services depend on complex interactions between species and the environment. These interactions are very dynamic and often involve non-linear processes. Managing biodiversity and habitats also requires considering various influencing factors, such as potential climate impacts, evolving socio-economic pressures, and their associated uncertainties. This shift from a static conservation perspective to an adaptive management approach is emphasized in the “Guidelines on climate change and Natura 2000”. The Natura 2000 network, including over 27,000 sites and more than 1 million of km2, underscores the importance of adaptive management of natural habitats for these protected areas and the territory they are part of.

Adaptive management of ecosystems and socio-ecological systems is an iterative process that combines management actions with targeted monitoring. This ongoing learning approach, aims to enhance the adaptive capacity of impacted habitats and endangered species of plants and animals. In the context of climate change, adaptive management involves: (i) the analysis of knowledge of potential climate impacts and associated uncertainty, (ii) the design of actions to cope with such impacts, (iii) the monitoring of climate-sensitive species, habitat, ecosystem services and processes to evaluate management effectiveness, and (iv) the redesign and implementation of improved (or new) management actions. For an effective adaptive management of natural systems under climate change conditions, the following strategies shall be taken in consideration:

  • Understand natural processes: Understand that natural processes are dynamic and that species are expected to respond individually to climate change effects. Thus, habitat management needs to be flexible, adaptive and specific.
  • Adapt conservation priorities: Respond to changing conservation priorities (due to climate change) and learn from experiences at local, regional, national and international levels by adapting conservation targets, mechanisms and plans.
  • Mainstream adaptive management: Mainstream the principles of adaptive management of natural habitats within other management plans and land use strategies. This will enable or support the natural development of climate resilient ecosystems, and promote the services they can provide also in the perspective of climate change adaptation.
  • Engage stakeholders: Engage relevant stakeholders to illustrate and discuss consequences of different management options for species and ecosystems, also highlighting effects on ecosystem services. An early and transparent stakeholder engagement can increase the acceptance of adaptive management actions for natural habitats that may create some limitations, such as fisheries restriction, restoration of forests or changes in mountain pasture management (e.g. changes in mowing time).
  • Monitor results: Establish targeted monitoring of climate change impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services (e.g. assessing species abundance, migration processes, changes in phenology, etc.) and integrate monitoring results into management processes in order to continually improve decisions.

Commonly recognised actions for adaptive management of natural habitats include:

  • Enhancing ecological networks for conservation. An ecological network for conservation (see the Climate-ADAPT adaptation option Improve the functional connectivity of ecological networks) is a system of core habitats connected by ecological corridors, established and restored as needed, to preserve biodiversity in fragmented ecosystems (IUCN Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 30). This is particularly important as climate change may induce species to migrate in search of suitable habitats for survival. Ecological networks can be enhanced by expanding, restoring, connecting and preserving core habitats from current and future threats. The establishment and management of protected areas, along with other Effective Area-based Conservation measures (OECMs), plays a key role in preserving ecological networks by protecting ecosystems vulnerable to multiple pressures, including climate change. They also help to protect ecosystems that may naturally buffer specific climate change impacts. For example, in marine and coastal environments, restoration and preservation of seagrasses, saltmarshes, corals and mangroves is relevant for fighting erosion and for attenuating incoming wave energy. Green and blue infrastructure supports the improvement of ecosystem connectivity, especially in urban and sub-urban areas.
  • Identifying and protecting key ecological features for ecosystem restoration. The protection of key ecological features requires a landscape- based approach for the management of structural habitat characteristics (e.g forest seral stages), critical habitats (e.g fish spawning sites), and species that play important functional roles (Thurman et al 2024). Key ecological features may relate to a species or community (e.g. a predator that impacts a large biomass or number of species), or to an important habitat type (e.g. that supports high productivity or aggregations of nesting or breeding animals).
  • Identifying and protecting Climate Change Refugia. Climate change Refugia are areas characterized by stable local climatic and environmental conditions that persist over time, despite changes at regional and global scales (Ashcroft et al., 2012). While methods for identifying marine refugia are still evolving, they typically rely on climate data, topographic information and the presence of relict species populations that were once more widely distributed (IUCN Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 24). In the Mediterranean, Greek researchers have developed a method for identifying refugia, based on large-scale climate stability and small-scale climatic variability within landscapes (Doxa et al.,2022, Science for Environment Policy news article).
  • Support gene flow: Promoting genetic diversity may be vital for enhance species’ adaptive capacity, especially when considering species translocation (introduction, re-introduction or restocking) and/or ex-situ conservation. However, species translocation should be carefully evaluated based on long-term risks, social acceptance, and legal constraints.

Establishing a comprehensive monitoring program is essential to track the effectiveness and potential impacts of such measures.

Adaptation Details

IPCC categories
Institutional: Government policies and programmes, Structural and physical: Ecosystem-based adaptation options
Stakeholder participation

Conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services cannot be achieved without the widespread engagement of society as a whole. Therefore, substantial emphasis should be placed on co-operative working between local planning authorities, landowners, NGOs, local-communities and other stakeholders to encourage the planning, establishment and maintenance of adaptive management measures, including the creation of ecological networks.

Success and limiting factors

There are many challenges involved in opting for conservation approaches that consider adaptive management. One of the main process-related challenges is due to the fact that adaptive management is an approach integrating risks and uncertainties (e.g. due to climate change impacts, land use changes, etc.), making management and decisions more complex and, therefore, needing a clear commitment to flexibility and openness for long-term learning processes. From a practical point of view, one of the main challenges is due to the fact that much of the land is privately owned and natural habitats are already very fragmented and exposed to several pressures, which limits the full implementation of some of the key elements of adaptive management (e.g. those related to the possible expansion of habitats and free movement of species).

Success in implementing adaptive management of natural habitats can be enhanced by:

  • Implementing no-regrets actions, addressing the full range of likely impacts;
  • Strengthening awareness on the high value of resilient ecosystems and their services, also in terms of improved climate change adaptation;
  • Integrating adaptation across relevant sectors (e.g. water and flood risk management, agriculture, forestry, urban planning), making use of the potential of ecosystem based adaptation approaches;
  • Promoting partnerships between public and private sectors;
  • Engaging all relevant stakeholders, including local communities and NGOs.
Costs and benefits

Costs can greatly vary depending on the actual measures being implemented. They can include: (1) costs for undertaking studies on climate scenarios, climate change impacts and biodiversity vulnerabilities, (2) costs on defining solutions and planning adaptation, (3) costs for measures implementation (including for example, buying lands, conducting works for habitat creation or restoration, etc.), and (4) costs for monitoring the effects of the implemented measures.

In the perspective of climate change, adaptive management of habitats aims to improve the adaptation capacity of natural systems. Key benefits for biodiversity include increased resilience of plant and animal species to the effects of climate change. This approach also aims to maintain and improve ecosystem services, including those relevant for climate change adaptation. Biodiverse and resilient ecosystems provide regulatory services that help mitigate climate risks to human society. For example, ongoing monitoring and adaptive management of preserved forests in mountain regions can reduce vulnerability to landslides, which may be exacerbated by more frequent and intense extreme precipitation events. Similarly, adaptive management of existing green spaces and the creation of new green infrastructures in urban areas can decrease the vulnerability to heatwaves.

Preserving, protecting and restoring ecosystems provide benefits for mitigating greenhouses gas emissions. Both marine and terrestrial ecosystems play a crucial role in carbon storage. Coastal wetlands (mangroves, seagrasses and saltmarshes) sequester and store vast amounts of carbon, often referred to as blue carbon. On the other hand, green carbon refers to the carbon sequestered by land ecosystems, including soils and biomass. It is associated with forests, peatlands, grasslands, savannahs, tundra, and croplands.

In addition, resilient ecosystems offer important provisioning services from an economic perspective. This is relevant, for example, for agriculture (especially with regard to the role of soil and its ecological communities), fisheries or the supply of fresh water resources. Finally, resilient and well-preserved ecosystems can deliver important cultural services, with benefits for the human well-being and again some economic activities (e.g. tourism).

Implementation time

In general, time for the definition of an adaptive management scheme is a matter of few years (1-3), also including the due stakeholders’ consultation phase. The implementation phase is expected to take more time, although it is highly dependent on the specific adaptation measure considered.

Lifetime

By definition any adaptive approach requires the adoption of a continuous process of planning, implementing, monitoring and reviewing. Lifetime of specific adaptation measures depends on their typologies and maintenance, but it is generally very long with benefits that are expected to last indefinitely.

Reference information

Websites:
References:

The EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020

Green O. O., Ahjond A. S., (2012). Adaptive management to protect biodiversity: Best available science and the endangered species act. Diversity 2012, 4, 164-178; doi:10.3390/d4020164

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2019). Voluntary guidelines for the design and effective implementation of ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction and supplementary information. Technical Series No. 93. Montreal.

DEFRA (2008). England biodiversity strategy. Climate change adaptation principles; conserving biodiversity in a changing climate.

DEFRA (2007). Conserving biodiversity in a changing climate: guidance on building capacity to adapt.

IUCN Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 30, Guidelines for conserving connectivity through ecological networks and corridors

Gross, John E., Woodley, Stephen, Welling, Leigh A., and Watson, James E.M. (eds.) (2016).  Adapting to Climate Change: Guidance for protected area managers and planners. Best Practice  Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 24, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. xviii + 129 pp

IUCN WCPA Issues Paper Series No. 2,  Climate change and protected areas

Published in Climate-ADAPT Sep 3, 2016   -   Last Modified in Climate-ADAPT Dec 5, 2024

Language preference detected

Do you want to see the page translated into ?

Exclusion of liability
This translation is generated by eTranslation, a machine translation tool provided by the European Commission.